home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Amiga Plus 1995 #5 & #6
/
Amiga Plus CD - 1995 - No. 5 and 6.iso
/
pd
/
grafik
/
lightwave
/
lightwave-jan95
/
000007_owner-lightwave-l _Tue Jan 3 18:08:21 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-02-04
|
2KB
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by mail.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id PAA03683; Tue, 3 Jan 1995 15:22:19 -0800
Received: from bv.com by mail.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id PAA03559; Tue, 3 Jan 1995 15:21:00 -0800
Received: from gaw011p.kc.bv.com (kcpbldg01.bv.com) by bv.com (5.59/3.1.090690-Black & Veatch)
id AA22962; Tue, 3 Jan 95 17:24:46 CST
Received: by gaw011p.kc.bv.com with Microsoft Mail
id <2F09DCAA@gaw011p.kc.bv.com>; Tue, 03 Jan 95 17:24:26 cst
From: "Bunnell, John M." <13796bunne@kcpbldg01.bv.com>
To: "'lightwave-l'" <lightwave-l@netcom.com>
Subject: RE: Responses to questions
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 95 17:23:00 cst
Message-Id: <2F09DCAA@gaw011p.kc.bv.com>
Encoding: 33 TEXT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: bulk
Nik, I hasten to agree and was thinking about posting a similar message
after the holidaze. If not cc: the list with all responses, if the person
who receives the best (less time consuming, most effective) solution for the
question asked would cc: that response alone would work. Makes sense to me.
jmb
----------
From: owner-lightwave-l
To: LW Mailing List
Subject: Responses to questions
Date: Tuesday, January 03, 1995 10:57PM
The LW list seems pretty quiet these days, but the reason seems to be not
necessarily everybody moving over to the newsgroup (which has IMHO a
worse signal to noise ratio) but because most people seem to be
responding via E-mail.
The idea behind the list the way I see it, is to share the ideas with
everyone. So, can you guys when responding, please Cc: to the list as
well ?
Otherwise, a lot of good info gets lost.
Just my thoughts....
Oh, and Happy New Year everyone!
Nik.
nvukovlj@extro.ucc.su.oz.au